Corporate & Enterprise Solutions

Our delivery process maps to SOC 2 controls, and we can co-author the evidence for ISO 27001, HIPAA and PCI engagements rather than handing your compliance team a codebase and leaving them to reconstruct what happened. In practice that means change management through reviewed pull requests, access control and audit logging designed in from the start, secrets held in a managed store rather than in the repository, and dependency scanning running in CI. Being audit ready is mostly a function of doing ordinary engineering consistently and being able to evidence it, rather than a separate workstream bolted on before assessment.

We deploy into the AWS, Azure or GCP regions you require, with VPC peering, private endpoints, and encryption at rest and in transit as defaults rather than options. Where a jurisdiction requires data to remain in country, that constrains architecture decisions early: which managed services are available in that region, where backups and logs are written, and whether any third party processor in the stack moves data across a border. That last one is the usual surprise, because an analytics or error reporting tool can quietly undo a residency guarantee the rest of the architecture was built to honour.

Yes, including Okta, Microsoft Entra ID and Azure AD, Auth0, and on premise Active Directory, over SAML 2.0 or OIDC. Role based access control and SCIM provisioning are part of the work rather than an add on, because in an enterprise the joiner, mover and leaver process matters as much as the login itself: an account that is not deprovisioned when someone leaves is a finding in any security review. We map your existing group structure onto application roles rather than inventing a parallel permission model your IT team then has to maintain separately.

With discovery and a risk register before any code is written, because the main danger in legacy work is undocumented behaviour that something else quietly depends on. From there we usually propose a strangler pattern, routing functionality to new services incrementally while the old system keeps running, with a rollback available at every stage. A full replatform is sometimes the right answer, but it concentrates all the risk into one cutover. We will tell you honestly which one your situation calls for, including when the pragmatic answer is to leave a stable legacy component alone.

Yes, through a Managed Ops engagement covering an on call rotation, agreed response time SLAs, documented runbooks and quarterly disaster recovery drills. The drills matter more than the documents: a recovery procedure nobody has executed is a hypothesis, not a plan. We also push for meaningful alerting rather than maximal alerting, because a team that receives dozens of low value pages each week stops reading them, and the one that mattered gets missed. What gets monitored should map to what actually affects your customers, not to everything a dashboard is capable of displaying.